also sprach Paul Wouters <paul at xelerance.com> [2008.10.01.2052 +0200]: > Argh. This is a "too many buttons for people to push" problem. > We're still seeing combined auth/resolver servers because of bind, > and it's bad in general. What's bad "in general" about running nsd and unbound on the same machine? I know what's bad about BIND and the like, and it's not the fact that it provides both services *on the same machine*, but that *it provides both services*. -- martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/ "die menschen drängen sich zum lichte, nicht um besser zu sehen, sondern um besser zu glänzen." - friedrich nietzsche spamtraps: madduck.bogus at madduck.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/) URL: <http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/unbound-users/attachments/20081001/f947388a/attachment.pgp>