On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, martin f krafft wrote: > What's bad "in general" about running nsd and unbound on the same > machine? I know what's bad about BIND and the like, and it's not the > fact that it provides both services *on the same machine*, but that > *it provides both services*. Running them both is fine. I was talking against some proposals where magic happens between the two daemons for a 'seamless' integration of modified auth zones. Paul