W.C.A. Wijngaards via Unbound-users <unbound-users at unbound.net> wrote: > > Following the "not a bug" response from the BIND maintainers > > yesterday evening, can you please point to chapter and verse > > mandating this behaviour for non-authoritative recursive > > resolvers? > > RFC4035 3.2.3 for validators, all RRsets in answer and authority > sections should be authentic ... > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4035#section-3.2.3 That's about setting the ad bit. Was it set in this response? Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ Humber, Thames: North 5 or 6, backing south 3 or 4, backing southeast 5 to 7 later. Slight or moderate, occasionally rough later. Showers, rain later. Good, occasionally poor later.