Maintained by: NLnet Labs

[Unbound-users] about memory leak? Unbound 1.4.22

Techs_Maru
Tue May 26 04:40:31 CEST 2015


Hi,Andreas,

thank you for reply.

> have you read http://www.unbound.net/documentation/howto_optimise.html ??
>
> "Due to malloc overhead, the total memory usage is likely to rise to double
> (or 2.5x) the total cache memory that is entered into the config."
>
> And no, memory leaks are not common in Unbound to my knowledge at least.

Yes,I know them.
I have read the document.
But,because I have felt using too many memory by Unbound Process...

I think trying the tuning of parameters of value.
thanks.

best regards.

/// Maru


2015-05-22 22:49 GMT+09:00  <lst_hoe02 at kwsoft.de>:
>
> Zitat von Techs_Maru <tecabu at gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi,Folks,
>>
>> I have questions about Unbound 1.4.22
>>
>> I began to use recently Unbound.
>> before that i was using ISC-BIND.
>>
>> Unbound to service in a production environment,
>> It seems like memory leak as the recursive query increases.
>> Is high and utilization compared to ISC-BIND.
>> (but,Unbound and ISC-BIND rr-cache-size configure parameter is different.)
>>
>> Unbound is easy to memory leak?
>> Or ,Unbound bugs?
>> Or , It is proportional to the cache size value ?
>>
>> Now "Resident set size" is about 4GB.
>>
>> It does parameter tuning is bad?.....
>>
>
> Hello,
>
> have you read http://www.unbound.net/documentation/howto_optimise.html ??
>
> "Due to malloc overhead, the total memory usage is likely to rise to double
> (or 2.5x) the total cache memory that is entered into the config."
>
> And no, memory leaks are not common in Unbound to my knowledge at least.
>
> Regards
>
> Andreas
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unbound-users mailing list
> Unbound-users at unbound.net
> http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users