Maintained by: NLnet Labs

[Unbound-users] Does unbound work with Cisco WCCP?

W.C.A. Wijngaards
Mon Jun 22 12:32:52 CEST 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi Yuri,

On 09/06/15 12:12, Yuri Voinov wrote:
> http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/app_ntwk_services/waas/acns/v55/c
onfiguration/local/guide/55ldg/wccpch.html#wp1353686
>
> 
> 
> http://i.imgur.com/WSSL3kF.png
> 
> Just FYI.
> 
> So, the question is same.

My guess is that the machine is offering DNS resolution in addition to
the WCCP service.  And the DNS and WCCP do not really interact (apart
from DNS lookups or using spare CPU cycles), so you are free to use
any DNS resolver you want.

Best regards,
   Wouter


> 
> Note: I've already used route map to intercept port 53 queries and
> point it to Unbound instance. But WCCP has lower router CPU load
> and more effective.
> 
> _______________________________________________ Unbound-users
> mailing list Unbound-users at unbound.net 
> http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=wOs1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----