Maintained by: NLnet Labs

[Unbound-users] [DNSSEC] BIND validates but not Unbound: who is right?

Stephane Bortzmeyer
Mon Feb 16 17:34:53 CET 2015


[The domain has recently changed its configuration so do not test it.]

With Unbound, I get a SERVFAIL:

% dig DNSKEY cepn.asso.fr

; <<>> DiG 9.9.5-8-Debian <<>> DNSKEY cepn.asso.fr
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 62442
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags: do; udp: 4096
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;cepn.asso.fr.		IN DNSKEY

;; Query time: 21 msec
;; SERVER: ::1#53(::1)
;; WHEN: Mon Feb 16 16:57:58 CET 2015
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 41

But BIND accepts it (and so does Google Public DNS):

% dig @relay1.nic.fr DNSKEY cepn.asso.fr

; <<>> DiG 9.9.5-8-Debian <<>> @relay1.nic.fr DNSKEY cepn.asso.fr
; (2 servers found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 30861
;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags: do; udp: 4096
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;cepn.asso.fr.		IN DNSKEY

;; ANSWER SECTION:
cepn.asso.fr.		7808 IN	DNSKEY 257 3 5 (
				AwEAAaBtXBNAyFHVvRBB4K9z79+1YRXkUDyycyCzPRpm
				Xi9lhB0Eg5vM3XlaS6OuN0dnFHItpZFNIDBDrPsN1OCf
				1ULKWpD3KDl1mE7zRK2W0HXeu4WOoFpUcC/1h06W26DT
				CkisntU9L8JfPi9osmI+CuzWZhdmyZt+hPvMpjmDthyh
				MZpb//kNv7+TUeczCo4MExHxjHHIVH0vRmhfyo/J1KBe
				6eS3G5lDbJEEFUdxuLyGQLaG2f6wlQxoHGnzvM+V/Mj8
				yGHae//7Z5rMCdaiLJy03u5+l2WVVy954dsrFC6mkB5s
				M4n8nvbo1d5ap7cI76dJi9X0IUJQohZk5b5eef0=
				) ; KSK; alg = RSASHA1; key id = 36778
cepn.asso.fr.		7808 IN	DNSKEY 256 3 5 (
				AwEAAc6AqnBoi+hfxMqtb0eokyqWT46Os5N6ZYoFm8Gb
				t90EF3hTpuwDClEsulKSckhr4zFTDj3SvHc9krzeQEl5
				UNCqmmZeMo/wsxKHTzIVU75fPrs1zOuM9m9zRNV4q9eG
				Y0+I2h4D7E/WlPE7n57E0lmPOxK9g46xE8p9eX3bWVVK
				FSm60VvginZfTzN3Zgt+peecrboEZnSzWvDVcHY2dq+o
				w0UEekI1+nfwcIgEOn0Wh8B5Gx3pG5XkV3QvHVN514FH
				eJLdsk0iFPHv1Xc0rLYWssFVS9s7Z8u0tEju6LshGaPQ
				+zrQr54RMD9IecwbMCERcrjV2Dm5CZq+Jf53pGc=
				) ; ZSK; alg = RSASHA1; key id = 54030
cepn.asso.fr.		7808 IN	RRSIG DNSKEY 5 3 10800 (
				20250115124200 20150216080551 36778 cepn.asso.fr.
				fc1YnbjbglVC8alL9NN9LUo54kUODgk6gblFt+CjDJ4+
				0i9HqEdbbW/49wksEMkFySPf24yRaswbf9W/OHeJtXid
				6CEcVdZiHfPuTzxBelQVfPiIQreJ9yvxBF1z/pmTBf0X
				o8TEMUjaV4f2c5eqELKdZ986RRk6J35tDd0w3cbeHGV1
				mnAagjT+SOLlmF8mx6MZkgsgFylBIt0MfEaX1ZS4PfAh
				TCIXi6shM0KcwZ7rI24nVGcu6wDfxdiwUZ5lJ6KWFBsM
				pC0beLiKRYlqnQidkech+dlSHQGj0DXAINi6ZrS+iRhv
				mCLlId4oezMaxx8P3dLo71cAqPGNBwM62A== )
cepn.asso.fr.		7808 IN	RRSIG DNSKEY 5 3 10800 (
				20250115124200 20150216080551 54030 cepn.asso.fr.
				v1b7K0jZ4WH1yMCvJHOkxWp7EUHtsFPpKjwplu8EhqDs
				WAwB0ORSFMN6Y0PDMfSydXeSwn3+L75OKk1Ne6VNaE5E
				jeYi7BEChE0wZH1L6/qyIHgw0YCDfQN4HuG005RFRKgi
				p1t06h3iKnVHFzduSxSby5Oq3iZgbyaSPeAhDa/LZPXv
				oNb1cVmVrPKTIhZqSxKNC0t4XQ3iUffgrLvq1ErFeuut
				QQeD3uzwWXCUkZA5rK7fp9eKKlSOJpP3na2r8cEy0WlC
				jZ2HNPA6pIUnq+w7eD0oGp0aukJ1C85TeE1a8cr3Luf8
				LnSXm7cIxSWOdw9GZEjaavWFfpYdguFxQQ== )

;; Query time: 1 msec
;; SERVER: 2001:67c:2218:9::4:162#53(2001:67c:2218:9::4:162)
;; WHEN: Mon Feb 16 17:01:03 CET 2015
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 1193

I also tested with OARC's ODVR service which confirmed that there is a
difference between BIND and Unbound. 

At the time of the test, the DS were:


% dig DS cepn.asso.fr

; <<>> DiG 9.9.5-8-Debian <<>> DS cepn.asso.fr
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 6975
;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 3, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags: do; udp: 4096
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;cepn.asso.fr.		IN DS

;; ANSWER SECTION:
cepn.asso.fr.		171998 IN DS 36778 5 2 (
				D21FC827CF4621DF88D06A8F6EA5F4B4DE72A362AB2E
				03D440C315A9D8FE1407 )
cepn.asso.fr.		171998 IN DS 13585 8 2 (
				AB057D7A9BBDB721EBD33FC64F3C6CC53D9020D12F18
				BCEFC696494C9F9D6111 )
cepn.asso.fr.		171998 IN RRSIG	DS 8 3 172800 (
				20150321132707 20150120132707 36264 fr.
				sotb2QNe0eJ6v6AxNaRgOzwYZVpg4XwDvRNp2S01kW/B
				ImMpX5oYo2EpIkmbcO+1y+yNjk0tqyiEo1OJbxzpyV1X
				xrUDQXjV1qbLgxZD3xLe9UG/VsMpImZJaiXjyd5xCT31
				sPmNdh8d/T5FzWTb6jGWUY1GC4WHp8Ib4I9GWgI= )

;; Query time: 0 msec
;; SERVER: ::1#53(::1)
;; WHEN: Mon Feb 16 16:58:19 CET 2015
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 299


DNSviz, like Unbound, says the domain is broken:

http://dnsviz.net/d/cepn.asso.fr/VOGwhA/dnssec/

But Zonemaster sees no problem:

http://zonemaster.net/test/3713