Maintained by: NLnet Labs

[Unbound-users] unbound wrapper in Go

Miek Gieben
Mon Jul 2 10:09:35 CEST 2012


[ Quoting <wouter at nlnetlabs.nl> in "Re: [Unbound-users] unbound wrapper..." ]
> > ub_result->answer_packet the message-id in the message 0. Is this
> > on purpose or do I screw up somewhere?
> 
> Yes, on purpose, since this reply is from a unix-pipe, the ID field
> does not have to be used.

Ok.

> > Another thing is that there is no TTL in ub_result, also on purpose
> > I presume?
> 
> There is in the answer packet, TTL per resource record even.  A TTL
> field could be added to the ub_result, but would break ABI, even
> though it is not that interesting for most users (and power users can
> parse the answer_packet).

Ok, that makes sense. Thanks for your reply.

 Regards,

-- 
    Miek Gieben                                                   http://miek.nl
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/unbound-users/attachments/20120702/17a06fff/attachment.pgp>