Maintained by: NLnet Labs

[Unbound-users] Old or incorrect information returned?

Haw Loeung
Mon Nov 9 02:15:04 CET 2009


On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 12:54:05 am W.C.A. Wijngaards wrote:
>  From your data they waited for one day.  Could it be this that
> triggered the complaint?  Different way of keeping the cache and the old
> servers still serving the old zone, turns the TTL until the new data is
> displayed larger than the one day they expected?  (or did they expect
> even faster convergence, even though they used a 24h TTL?)
> 

"they waited for one day" referred to one of our staff members who was 
handling the report. Our staff member did a dig, waited 24 hours and did the 
same dig against the same resolvers and still received incorrect information. 
It's almost as if unbound was still caching the old delegation.

-- 
Haw Loeung
Systems Administrator
TPG Internet
http://www.tpg.com.au
_______________________________________________________________________
  
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/unbound-users/attachments/20091109/cb566cd6/attachment.pgp>